The governing body has invited teams, organisers, and riders to submit proposals on calendar reform, commercial rights, financial rules and fan engagement as it seeks a more sustainable model for men’s and women’s professional road cycling.

Professional road cycling has rarely lacked global visibility.

From roadside crowds to expanding international calendars, the sport continues to project scale and tradition in equal measure. Yet behind that growth narrative sits a more complicated commercial reality.

It is against that backdrop that the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) has launched a wide-ranging consultation on the future structure of men’s and women’s professional road cycling.

The process, approved unanimously by the UCI Management Committee at its 29–30 January meeting, invites stakeholders to submit proposals on the sport’s calendar, participation rules, commercial rights and financial regulations by 30 April.

Why the UCI is revisiting cycling’s economic model

In a letter sent to the Association Internationale des Organisateurs de Courses Cyclistes (AIOCC), the Association Internationale des Groupes Cyclistes Professionnels (AIGCP) and Cyclistes Professionnels Associés (CPA), UCI President David Lappartient acknowledged both the sport’s popularity and its commercial limitations.

Although cycling is “hugely popular”, its “media exposure and the revenues it generates do not match its popularity”, he wrote. That assessment underpins the governing body’s decision to reopen structural discussions.

The letter also highlights mounting financial pressures within the professional road cycling ecosystem. Rider salaries have “increased significantly”, team budgets have grown, and the gap between teams has widened. At the same time, organisers are facing rising costs, particularly around safety, with some increasingly reliant on public funding to sustain events.

Crucially, Lappartient concedes that earlier governance reforms clarified the sport’s regulatory structure but did not deliver comparable progress on the economic component intended to accompany them. In effect, the commercial foundations of professional road cycling remain fragmented.

This fragmentation is most visible in the way value is created and distributed across the men’s and women’s WorldTour structures. Unlike league-based sports with centralised media rights, cycling’s model remains event-led, with organisers controlling commercial rights and teams dependent largely on sponsorship income.

Commercial rights and revenue distribution under review

The UCI consultation explicitly places the economic model at the centre of reform discussions.

Among the themes listed are the “management of commercial rights (media and sponsorship)”, the “creation of new commercial rights and distribution of the value generated”, solidarity mechanisms between levels of the sport, financial rules for organisers, teams and riders, and the regulation of rider transfers.

These issues touch on the balance of power between organisers and teams, the sustainability of smaller outfits, and the ability of the women’s WorldTour to consolidate recent growth.

Women’s professional road cycling has expanded rapidly in recent seasons, with stronger structures and increased broadcast visibility. The UCI has also accelerated the internationalisation of the sport, launching new UCI WorldTour and UCI Women’s WorldTour events across multiple continents and staging the Road World Championships in Africa for the first time. A recently launched event in India further underscores that expansion strategy.

Yet international growth does not automatically translate into a stable or equitable revenue model. The consultation suggests the UCI is prepared to consider adjustments to how value is generated and shared across the professional pyramid.

Image of a AG2R Mondial rider during the tour de France following Decathlon's ownership announcement
Image: Shutterstock

Calendar reform and participation rules

Beyond commercial rights, the consultation also reopens questions around the event calendar and participation structure. Stakeholders are invited to provide input on competition formats, the organisation of the race and team pyramid, participation rules for teams and riders, and the broader internationalisation strategy.

The professional road cycling calendar has expanded in recent years, driven in part by globalisation ambitions. However, expansion brings logistical complexity, competitive congestion and varying levels of commercial viability.

Participation rules and the structure of the WorldTour pyramid are commercially sensitive, and access to major races shapes sponsorship value, media exposure, and team stability.

Any adjustment to these frameworks would have ripple effects across men’s and women’s professional road cycling.

Fan engagement, technology and integrity

The UCI’s consultation extends beyond economics and calendar reform. Fan engagement and digital strategy form a dedicated pillar, with references to digital platforms, television production and the integration of artificial intelligence and new technologies.

In parallel, safety and integrity remain central themes. The letter references course design, conduct rules, equipment standards and the use of technology such as GPS tracking and in-race communication, alongside anti-doping and consistency in officiating.

These elements reflect a broader understanding that the commercial value of professional road cycling is closely tied to credibility, safety and broadcast presentation.

Perhaps the most pointed passage in the correspondence concerns past attempts to reform professional cycling. Various initiatives “aimed at reforming professional road cycling” were either abandoned or failed to materialise, with the lack of prior consultation and consensus cited as contributing factors.

Lappartient emphasises that any future structural development must take place “under the aegis of the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI).” That framing signals a governing body intent on steering reform rather than reacting to it.

The consultation period runs until 30 April, after which the UCI will enter more detailed discussions with stakeholders. A working methodology is set to be proposed at the next meeting of the Professional Cycling Council on 4 March

Previous articleInfantino renews FIFA Coin idea despite no clear plan
Next articleBBC posts record Winter Olympics audience as sponsors see major digital gains